VAT and Adviser Charging – RDR Update

by Caroline Gutman on 23 Feb 2012

HMRC have issued further draft guidance on the important issue of VAT and adviser charging under RDR.

Representations were made by interested bodies following the Draft Guidance issued last year.  The latest (revised) draft guidance note appears to offer greater reassurance of VAT freedom in relation to charges made for the services of financial advisers.

The draft anticipates that:

An adviser’s role in the retail investment market will normally involve them entering into arrangements with the customer under which they may:

1.         gather information about the customer (fact-find)

2.         carry out research to find suitable investment options

3.         provide the customer with reports, financial health-checks, forecasts

4.         recommend specific investment products to the customer, including the prices at which these can be arranged

5.         act between the product provider/s and the customer with a view to arranging the sale of the retail investment products agreed with the customer

6.         and, where applicable, ie where the customer agrees to an ongoing review service, monitor the customer’s ongoing position to ensure that the products continue to meet the requirements of the customer

Most helpfully the draft guidance appears to contemplate that where the customer has agreed to the arrangement of a retail investment product and the adviser performs the necessary services, as outlined at stages (1- ) 5 above, (regardless of whether the sale of the product is finally concluded), and they are able to evidence that they have done so, no VAT will be due on any charges made to the customer for these services.

And a similar stance, dependant on what the client has agreed in relation to the services that the adviser will deliver (including the potential arrangement of a retail investment product), is taken in relation to charges for ongoing services.

Provided by Techlink

Read more at: www.techlink.co.uk

HMRC Draft Guidance, as of February 2012

(The above HMRC Latest VAT Draft Guidance was current at time of publication. 23 February 2012)

← Back

Posted in: IFA News and Commentary,

Global Income – A Perfect Partnership?

by Caroline Gutman on 09 Feb 2012

Live Wednesday, February 22, 1pm – 2pm or afterwards on demand

In the current economic climate of low interest rates and low or even negative returns, income funds are fast becoming the must-haves. In this free online webinar, a panel of global equity experts will be talking about where they’re seeing compelling opportunities for growing income; why it is that their investment trusts have been able to deliver steady, predictable income growth for their shareholders; and why global income isn’t just a passing phase.

Attend here: http://www.brighttalk.com/r/TkD

This session will be moderated by Jackie Beard, Director Closed-end Fund Research, Morningstar who will be leading the discussion alongside:

  • Bruce Stout, Senior Investment Manager, Aberdeen Asset Management
  • Peter Hewitt, Director, Global Equities at F&C Asset Management, F&C Investments
  • James de Sausmarez, Director and Head of Investment Trusts, Henderson
  • John Baker, Joint Fund Manager of J.P. Morgan Income and Capital Trust, J.P. Morgan Income and Growth Trust and J.P. Morgan Elect Managed Income

If you are unable to join any the live event, you can watch on demand immediately afterwards. During the live event you will be able to submit questions to the panel and take part in audience votes.

← Back

Posted in: Events, IFA News and Commentary, Morningstar, Research,

An Investment Process

by Caroline Gutman on 06 Feb 2012

(Guest post by Ian Holdsworth, Managing Director of Financial Solutions SC Limited)

With RDR, qualifications, segmentation etc as well as trying to run a profitable company it has been extremely helpful to find a company that will free up more of my time to enable my company to give expert investment advice based on thorough research rather than a managed fund or a “flavour of the day”.

Although the majority of my investments are held on platform or within a SIPP there has been in the past very little in the way of independent portfolio tools that can help build a diversified portfolio based on attitude to risk and asset allocation.

Morningstar offers an in-depth solution with their Adviser Workstation that has no bias towards particular funds or companies and more importantly gives in depth research into each fund selected. It is then possible to build a model portfolio based on risk and asset allocation that are all shown on their system. This ensures that no sector is over or underweight and that the portfolios can be rebalanced.

I would have to say it is not the most user-friendly system but it is certainly worth the while to spend time learning how it works and ensuring it fits in with your company requirements. The team at Morningstar could not have been more helpful though in helping me understand the system.

With the latest paper from the FSA looking into how IFAs recommend funds and put together portfolios I feel this would be an ideal solution to that issue.

Ian Holdsworth is Managing Director of Financial Solutions SC Limited, an FSA-registered financial advisery firm based in Southend-on-Sea, Essex.

If you would like to contribute to this blog, please email your submission to: adviser@morningstar.co.uk with subject line “Blog post”

← Back

Posted in: IFA News and Commentary, Morningstar,

Technology, Profit and RDR

by Caroline Gutman on 25 Jan 2012

(Guest post by Michael Basi, principal of Basi & Basi Financial Planning Ltd)

Success of any business is, first and foremost, determined by profit. At the risk of sounding like a stuck record, without profit, no business can survive for the long-term. All plans for the best client care in the world are null and void if a practice is not actually around to provide such!

A business in any industry, when analysing the market and judging the likelihood of generating a profit from it – must start with the consumer. What does a consumer of financial planning services want to see? It is worth noting that our industry is somewhat more complicated, given we have a “mandatory consumer” in our regulator, with a very specific list of demands and needs in addition to the actual clients we service. So let’s take their fundamental requirements at a high level;

The FSA:

  1. Business in line with regulatory principles
  2. Evidence to demonstrate this

Clients:

  1. High quality financial planning advice which they can understand which is….
  2. …predicated on full market research and includes….
  3. ….monitoring of the on-going suitability of these recommendations

It stands to reason that meeting consumer requirements to a required extent, at lower cost, will result in greater profit. Therefore, having the tools in place to service these requirements in an efficient manner is the centre of a profitable practice. So where to start?

Use Adviser Workstation

First, define how you are going to perform your market research. What are the criteria? Ratings? Statistical measures? Whatever your choices, turn them into a formula for each asset class and geographic split.

With our practice, we then turned these equations into search criteria in the “Workspace” area of Workstation. Within this area of Workstation, select “New search” and choose the Universe (likely Open-End funds). One “search” could then be the following criteria as an example:

–          IMA Sector = UK All Companies (only funds in this sector)

–          Morningstar Rating >= 4 (only funds with a Morningstar rating of 4 or above)

As you add each criteria, hit the “Run Search” button in the bottom right to watch the universe become a filtered pool. When you are happy the number of filters has narrowed down the selection accordingly, BEFORE you hit “OK”, click “Save” at the top. This will store this criteria for easy repeat at quarterly reviews. Then click “OK”.

The list that results is your point-in-time output from your criteria.

Keep an Audit Trail

Before you do anything else, from the “Action” menu, select “Save As” and select “Investment List”.  I usually provide a descriptive name with the date included. This will keep your FSA consumer happy!

Now, I tend to create new model portfolios from my selected funds from each Investment List, and also date these to keep a trail of my investment decisions which I also document.

I then move to the Research section “Alerts” section and add a new alert

Communicate with the Client

So the FSA consumer should now be happy with the evidence we have. However, how does the “true” consumer, the client, know your worth? They need to see evidence of your work which they can understand. The reporting functionality within Adviser workstation is a key enabler to allow you to justify your fees.

Multiple reports are available from within Adviser Workstation, however we have settled on the following, which we find easy to talk a client through and something we can refer back to time and again;

–          Asset Allocation comparison (current to ideal)

–          Snapshot report

–          Efficient Frontier chart

–          Overal Customised Financial Planning Report

The final element, within the planning module, is most powerful. Within this, you can select almost any other available reports and combine to form a useful appendix for your covering Product confirmation letter.

But how will your client see this information? Two methods, via the web and via their smartphone.

Adding client reports to the (soon to be upgraded further) client portal allows a level of accessibility which many clients are not used to. This saves considerable time when combined with meaningful reports providing context, allowing the client to be quickly reminded of their investment plan in the light of (frequently negative) media reports.

Utilising a service such as provided by Onvestor (www.onvestor.co.uk) allows these reports and much other customised content from your firm to be available for clients to digest on the move, whilst commuting, indeed anytime. The incorporation of useful daily tools within this application is also a good idea, encouraging the client to keep your practice firmly in their sights each day.

Summary

Utilising building blocks of what our consumers actually want, together with technology available to deliver this in a cost-effective manner which self-promotes the firm can put us on the path to a bright future – both during 2012 and, more importantly, in the competitive world after this.

Michael Basi is principal of Basi & Basi Financial Planning Ltd, a independent practice, and a shareholder within Onvestor Limited, a new venture providing mobile services to financial planning firms.

If you would like to contribute to this blog, please email your submission to: adviser@morningstar.co.uk with subject line “Blog post”

← Back

Posted in: IFA News and Commentary, Morningstar, Quick Tips,

Getting Ready for RDR

by Caroline Gutman on 11 Nov 2011

According to the RDR, independent advice must include all retail investment products which are capable of meeting the investment needs and objectives of a retail client. In this interactive panel session chaired by Jackie Beard of Morningstar, experts will discuss the challenges we all face in achieving this, as investors, advisers and product providers.

Getting Reading for RDR: http://www.brighttalk.com/r/c7P

__

Dial-in: 0203 051 2315 ext. 5042

Live Wednesday 16th November 1pm GMT, or watch afterwards on demand

Job Curtis, Manager of City of London Investment Trust, will share his thoughts as manager of a retail fund, joined by Patrick Mill, Sales & Distribution Director at Alliance Trust, Mark Atherton from The Daily Telegraph brings the consumers’ perspective; Piers Currie is the voice of the asset manager and Andrew Neligan, Informed Choice, that of the adviser. Join us for what is sure to be a lively debate on the challenges ahead as we move towards RDR D-Day.

Join the live webcast to interact with the expert panelists, submit your questions directly to the panelists and share your opinion through engaging audience votes: http://www.brighttalk.com/r/c7P

Registration for this event is free, if you cannot join live or you can register now to watch afterwards on demand.

← Back

Posted in: Events, IFA News and Commentary,

Anecdotes from the floor

by jbeard on 03 Oct 2011

Last year Peter Hargreaves famously accused the investment trust world of being fuddy-duddies. Last week, at the Investment Week IT Forum, there wasn’t a fuddy-duddy in sight. In fact, it was quite the opposite.

It’s not uncommon to attend such events and see the same faces, particularly at an investment trust forum. So this year I was encouraged to see some new faces – and firms – on the delegate front.

Those that came along weren’t disappointed; it was a day well spent. The Rt Hon Peter Lilley gave the keynote speech to kick the day off. Not only was he the Deputy Leader of the Opposition, he’s an MP who served on the board of JPMorgan Claverhouse for 11 years and Melchior Japan for more than four years. So the world of investment trust investing is something he understands very well.

That said, Lilley’s speech focused on the current Eurozone crisis; his most memorable comments, to me, were on the interaction of economics and politics. He said that he’s never known a period when politics are powering economics and interacting as much as they are currently and that, while economics usually triumph over politics in the long run, this outcome was far from certain right now.

For Keynesian fans, he also made the observation that Keynes wrote in a time when there was no sovereign debt crisis and no single European currency.

Lilley wasn’t the only good speaker of the day. Job Curtis, manager of City of London, reminded us of the benefits of an income discipline, both from his perspective as a fund manager but also from a company’s perspective to its shareholders. He cited the fact that dividends have historically grown above the rate of inflation in the major markets, so with interest rates set to stay low for some time, dividends really make a difference to total returns. And of course the closed-end fund structure helps, with the ability to retain income in the reserve account.

Geoff Hsu, portfolio manager of The Biotech Growth Trust and employee of OrbiMed, gave a comparison of the biotech industry now with nearly 20 years ago. Hsu’s presentation reminded me of the ultra-long-term mindset needed when investing in such small companies and of course how sensitive they are to politics and factors beyond their control.

The third session was Tom Slater, deputy manager of Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust. Did you know that a child born in Shanghai today has a higher life expectancy than a child born in Washington? I didn’t, until this session. And yet often China is still referred to as a developing country.

Next up was Tom Walker from Martin Currie. Many know Tom for his North American OEIC, but he also manages MC Global Portfolio Trust. He highlighted the importance of countries such as Indonesia, the fourth most populous country with 240 million inhabitants, and cautioned us not to focus purely on China for growth in the East. His colleague, Alan Porter, who manages Securities Trust of Scotland, pointed out that we don’t need to hold emerging-market stocks to have EM exposure. The top 15 brands of Heinz account for 70% of its sales, according to Porter, and 23% of its sales are in EM countries. Even more attention-grabbing is the fact they sell around 650 million bottles of ketchup a year. That’s a lot of sauce.

Vincent Devlin of BlackRock  tried to demonstrate the breadth of BlackRock Greater Europe’s wide remit to us, coupled with its decent yield, of 3.5% – not to be sniffed at in the current environment, especially for a European fund. Unluckily for Devlin, all we really wanted to talk about was Greece.

The views of Polar Capital’s Ben Rogoff were consistent with his presentation at our Morningstar Conference earlier this year. He continues to extol the virtues of cloud computing and, given all we’ve witnessed in markets in recent months, sees no reason why technology should be considered a higher-risk sector than any other. He believes Apple is the Tiffany of computing. I don’t think we’ll be seeing Steve Jobs covered in diamonds any time soon, though.

A session from Renaissance delved into Russian politics and the government’s recognition at last that it must invest in infrastructure; hence they launched a dedicated sector fund in July. Manager Takouhi Tchertchian was over from Moscow to explain her investment rationale in person, along with her insights into the Kremlin. Some of the stats were quite shocking: for example, only 48% of landing strips at Russia’s airports have lights and less than 60% are paved. That certainly puts the third runway debate in the south of England into perspective.

Last but not least, we heard from Alex Barr of Aberdeen, on why private equity shouldn’t be overlooked and the abundance of possibilities that are showing on his radar as a result of the volatility in equity markets.

This is just a snapshot of the day. It was a packed schedule with some excellent speakers. It’s good to see new faces at such events. I hope that next time even more advisers will be interested. Russian infrastructure may not be top of your shopping list but I certainly ended the day more knowledgeable than at the start.

← Back

Posted in: Events, IFA News and Commentary,

Morningstar Will Provide Sector Monitoring for IMA

by Jon Standring on 29 Jul 2011

As you may have seen in the financial media recently, Morningstar UK has been appointed Sector Monitoring Organisation to IMA.

Following a successful bid, and starting on 1st October this year, Morningstar UK will be managing the data collection, processing, and reporting of all portfolio holdings for all open-end funds available to investors in the UK that are classified to IMA sectors. This will include considerable data monitoring, collection, and reporting work around fund derivatives holdings, which we believe to be a particularly crucial as the use of derivatives in investment management continues to rise and issues around their transparency grow.

In this regard, we’ll be working with the IMA to develop rules for monitoring funds that are not suited to long-only portfolio monitoring, including the identification of the increasing number of funds using derivatives for investment purposes beyond efficient portfolio management and the development of a recommended disclosure standard for derivatives holdings.

The collection and analysis of portfolio holdings is at the core of who we are and what we do. For the past 10 years, we’ve led the collection and analysis of full fund portfolio holdings across the UK and Europe based on our fundamental belief that investors need transparent and consistent analysis of full portfolio holdings in order to fully understand their investments.  We very much look forward to bringing this expertise to bear in our additional capacity as Sector Monitoring Organisation to the broader industry.

← Back

Posted in: IFA News and Commentary, Morningstar,

Techlink – What You Missed

by jmurphy on 22 Jul 2011

Continuing Morningstar’s partnership with Techlink, here’s what you may have missed over the past couple weeks:

**Treasury Publishes Consultation On Eis And Vct Investment Start-Up**_</p>

SYNOPSIS: The Treasury has published a consultation document on the simplification of the current EIS and VCT schemes, as well as introducing a new scheme to target early-stage investment in small companies
</em></strong>

In the March 2011 Budget the Chancellor made a commitment to consult on the simplification of the EIS and VCT schemes and support for seed investment and start-ups. The Treasury has now released a consultation document.  The aim is to consult on: · Additional support for seed investment via the creation of a new scheme; · Simplification of the current schemes; and ..continued on the Techlink website
**Pension Compensation And Taxation Consequences**
_
__SYNOPSIS: The whole issue of compensation relating to pension schemes is, to say the least, somewhat complicated.___

Over the last few months, the tax treatment of compensation payable to pension scheme members has become a hot topic. This follows on from the FSCS compensation paid in respect of Keydata products and the recent Treasury proposal to remove income and capital gains tax reliefs for ‘pension mis-selling’ compensation (see our bulletin dated 7 June 2011. As a result of the increased interest we ..continued on the Techlink website
**Pensioner Tax To Be Simplified**
_
__SYNOPSIS: The Treasury have asked the Office of Tax Simplification to review the system of pensioner taxation and make recommendations on how it may be simplified.___

In a letter dated 5 July 2011, David Gauke, Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury, has requested the Office of Tax Simplification (OTS) to provide a review of pensioner taxation.  The OTS is charged with identifying and examining which parts of the tax system that create the most complexity for pensioners and how this varies across the pensioner population. It is then asked to propose ways in ..continued on the Techlink website

Techlink, from Technical Connection, is the smart way for you to:

  • Keep up to date

  • Have access to a full library of technical information and interpretation on all the key issues surrounding personal and corporate tax, UK and offshore investments, protection, corporate and business markets and trusts

  • Get valuable assistance with securing your professional qualifications

and

  • Plan and carry out technical CPD and have it automatically logged for you

All of this content is delivered through an extensive and regularly updated range of text based documents, audio visual programmes and podcasts.

Techlink also provides you with copy for quarterly newsletters to send to your clients and professional connections.

← Back

Posted in: IFA News and Commentary,

Going Passive

by jmurphy on 11 Jul 2011

Alan Smith discusses his reasons for a passive investment approach.

Alan Smith, the CEO of London based Capital Asset Management and Morningstar Adviser Workstation user, discusses the reasons he’s taken a passive approach to investing since the financial crisis.

Alan and his team use Adviser Workstation to analyze their clients’ asset allocation and ensure they are properly allocated given their risk profile.

Click here for the interview on Citywire.

← Back

Posted in: IFA News and Commentary,

Some Thoughts on Fund Transparency

by jmurphy on 15 Mar 2011

How much detail do you need to know about the investment products you recommend? Do the prospectus of a fund and an updated provider fact sheet provide sufficient insight or do you need to dissect it further? As products become more and more specialized a more in-depth analysis of the fund and how it’s invested can help ensure it’s the right fit for the client or the portfolio in question.

I think it is suprising that we live in the information age yet basic information for some investment products is either difficult to come by or even withheld altogether from investors and their advisers. Does the transparency of a fund play into your decision to recommend it to a client? Many advisers have demanded greater transparency from asset managers, platforms, regulators and insurance companies, but unfortunately it seems some people evolve slower than others.

I have the exact same conversation at least once a month with advisers who are trying to analyze a client’s portfolio but are unable to do so because the asset allocation data Morningstar has, for some products, is incomplete. The first reaction is usually “How could Morningstar not have data for these funds?” The answer, more times than not, is because the fund or insurance company is reluctant to provide the detailed portfolio breakdown. Without this data, a complete analysis of the client’s portfolio cannot be done and the adviser’s ability to accurately advise on the client’s assets is limited to the published top ten holdings. Furthermore, an analysis taken from several different sources will include incomparable classifications of sectors and geographic exposures, creating an apples and oranges scenario. And in other cases, when the holdings data of a product is not available, some providers will use the sector average as a proxy, which is can be inaccurate as well as misleading.

So why would the full holdings (asset allocation) of an investment product be withheld from those in need of such information? Some do not feel the need to report such detailed information. With the vast majority of asset managers reporting their full holdings though, this just displays a limited number resistant to such positive change. And this is becoming more and more unacceptable to a growing community of advisers and investors that value independent, in-depth analysis.

Unfortunately, it can also be a commercial decision to not disclose full holdings data. Preferred relationships may stand in the way of working with other data or research vendors, which is a shame because the end investor couldn’t care less about such arrangements.

I would argue it is ultimately in the best interest of the product provider to provide such data because so many other product providers already do. If you’re comparing two funds and you have a full breakdown of the assets of one fund and nothing for the other, how could you possibly make an informed decision and choose the one with no data? And that’s not to mention the number of ETFs that publish portfolio holdings on a daily basis. If I’m an investor, or perhaps more importantly an adviser, transparency and disclosure of information are important factors when choosing where to put my (clients’) money – just ask Bernie Madoff’s investors.

← Back

Posted in: IFA News and Commentary,